AE is not popular in China, which reminds us of some early operating systems (in fact, the goal of AE is to make blockchain operating system). For example, UNIX is better than Windows in terms of technology as a server operating system, but it is not popular (it doesn’t know how to publicize, it doesn’t know how to enter the public with ease of use, and it thinks that the price is low and the technology is good .finally, it was gradually divided (BSD, AIX, Linux), while windows was popular with its high public acceptance and ease of use (the purchase cost was also much higher than BSD and so on).
The strategy that AE is pushing forward today is exactly what UNIX took in the past?
To let people accept AE and occupy a place in the emerging market, at present, the AE token price is the most direct way: when the price goes up, more people will pay attention to it; when more people pay attention to it, more people will develop or apply it; when more people develop and apply it, the market share will go up ,This is the beginning of a virtuous cycle.
It is not only emphasize the price of the token, at least,we need to make the holder feel that it’s worth holding AE, rather than being completely ignored by the team. Compared with the development team and the miners, the interests of the holders are directly violated (the token purchased in the early stage is directly devalued due to the increase of circulation). This is really sad for the holders. Besides, there are not only AE (windows was the only one in the market at that time),but also EOS and other projects are developing very well.
I’m afraid that when AE develops well in other countries and then come back to China, Other projects have already developed good project Ecology (opportunities are seized by them), and then no one is expected to be interested in the best technology of AE. The so-called best technology can only be used by the team itself.