Stop saying fallacies.
Specifically the fallacy of attacking the person instead of the argument, this proves you lost and can’t defend it properly.
Second, I can imagine a lot of other ways that they could get 20% easily, for example, they control 14% of the funds, that is around 44 million AE, and if they vote they would undoubtedly sway the vote in their favor without issues. currently the total amount in votes is around 5 million AE. another thing here is that they could say they would use the “mode”, or the value with most votes, instead of a weighted average they would totally be able to get 20% easily. Also, in your example, 10% is still not close to 20% and your have a difference of 17.65% which, in most mathematic methos is acceptable.
Third, when i developed the telegram bot I was not offered a payment, I developed it because I wanted to, because I wanted to see a working bot for a project I like. I was motivated because of the fact that if it works people will use it.
Fourht, the team has taken several unilateral decisions that I do not agree with, and that the community was not consulted upon, examples: The launch date felt rushed - no tools, no explorer, no functional wallet. The inflation chart - 100% inflation in less than 2 years felt like exaggerated. The increase in fees of 10000x - scared of a flood or abuse, but in fact it just makes the network more expensive to use. So don’t come at me trying to say I blindly follow them, I do not. I voice my opinion and they have heard me several times, you can ask any member of the telegram group or look at my posts in the forum. I am really vocal about it.
Fifth, you are too focused what you think you saw that you don’t realize what it really means. I see you complain over and over and say that people should vote this or that way. But have you proposed a real solution? A way to prevent this from happening ever again? Have you even considered the points of the guys that told you why it is not like you think? because all I see is you attacking the people and saying the same thing over and over. you are not convincing, you are not educating, you are preaching… like a zealot.
I don’t need to look you up, I don’t need to expose you, you are doing that on your own.
So, besides that point you keep repeating, do you have a new one? a real argument? a proposal?